Roadways to the Bench: Who Me? She brought her perspective as a survivor, and she was the only one who could talk about the role and conditions of imprisonment have on children. The issue that a boy deserves the same level of justice and rights as a man charged with a crime was not invented that year, said Peter Cahill, an attorney who tried juvenile cases in front of McGhee and who, from 2003 to 2015, served as judge of the same Gila County, Arizona court where Gerald Gault was sentenced. At the same time, I think we have to understand how much more needs to be done, both in terms of access to counsel, and making sure lawyers are trained in juvenile law., By todays standards, the Gault sentence from an Arizona court can seem a horrible case of judicial cruelty. Name one detail that supports that idea that the juvenile system has failed. (G) Are events AAA and FFF dependent? Mainzer was also a survivor of the notorious Bergen-Belsen concentration camp, which affected her work on Gault. Since states are not seeking to punish the youth, but to rehabilitate him, constitutional protections and due process not only werent necessary, but were a harmful distraction in the pursuit of helping children, Stewart wrote in his dissent. (E) What is the probability of a person having an IQ between 909090 and 120120120? It was only then, she learned from the Lewis family of Jerrys arrest. In addition, the Supreme Court did not address how the mandated changes in juvenile court procedure would be budgeted and funded. What are 3 pieces of textual evidence to support your claim? In its opinion, the Court unanimously overruled Betts v. Brady. The 20th century U.S. Supreme Court advanced the Constitutional rights of adult criminal defendants. Consequently, juvenile court judges were not expected to adhere to the rules of criminal procedure and juveniles typically were not represented by counsel in court hearings. You will receive your score and answers at the end. Justices Douglas, Clark, and Harlan each wrote concurring opinions. The Arizona Superior Court did not retry the case or close the file. However, in the 21st century, a growing body of scientific evidence about the developmental immaturity of the adolescent brain along with concerns about the societal standards for common decency have been cited by the U.S. Supreme Court in its decisions to render juveniles who commit homicides ineligible for capital punishment19 and for automatic sentences of life without parole.20 The APA (among others) signed onto amicus briefs in these cases, emphasizing that adolescents lack the executive functioning or maturity to appreciate the wrongfulness or consequences of their criminal acts. List one effect in Gault's culture that would not have changed if he not agreed to the interviews. likely to become violent in juvenile detention centers, B The justice system has failed juveniles, but there are ongoing attempts to improve the system, C Jerry Gault is slightly bitter about the way the court system treated him, but he believes the current system is fair, OD Legal professionals have developed a completely fair Gault did not have legal representation at either hearing and was not told that he had a right to counsel, regardless of his ability to pay. By granting due process rights to youth in juvenile court who face possible institutional confinement, In re Gault is said to have criminalized juvenile court proceedings. In 1967 the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision that would change dramatically the character of juvenile courts. Enrolling in a course lets you earn progress by passing quizzes and exams. This means the court assumed the role of the parent, and case decisions were to be based on the judges idea of the best interests of the child. Unfortunately, some judges were ill prepared to take on the role of benevolent parent. She later became a family court judge in New York. Mr. GAULT: At that time I was 14, you know, I didn't know. The defendant was fifteen year old Gerald Gault. to declare something as an important stage in the development of something political; Name something that unfair about the Gault case, He was charged worst than an adult/an adult would have only gotten 60 days whereas Gerry received seven years in juvenile detention center, This case established the constitutional right to counsel. Get started for free! Ms. JACKIE BAILLARGEON (Director, Gideon Project, Open Society Institute): Did they tell you what you're charged with when they got you? He found the case fascinating because an adult would have gotten a maximum sentence of 60 days for making an obscene phone call. ADLER: Gault was eventually released. Jerrys parents filed a writ of habeas corpus demanding their sons release. The arresting officer filed a petition with the court on the same day of Gaults initial court hearing. But a closer look at In re Gault shows the issues it raised werent new. Hopefully, the utilization of child forensic psychiatric consultation services by the juvenile court system will increase in the next half century. Now nearly 60, Gerry Gault talked about his arrest and how he was unable to contact his parents. Did you see a lawyer during that time frame? Jerry denies that. She sent his older brother out to look for him. The judge questioned Jerry who had no lawyer and was never advised of his right to remain silent. Gault did not get a fair trial nor did he get a lawyer. Lower Courts: The proceedings against Gault were conducted by a judge of the Superior Court of Arizona who was designated by his colleagues to serve as a juvenile court judge.Lower Court Ruling: The juvenile court judge committed Gault to juvenile detention until he attained the age of 21. When Mrs. Gault arrived at the Detention Home, she was told that a hearing was scheduled in juvenile court the following day. On May 15, 1967, the highest court in the country handed down its answer. Arizona statutes did not permit appeals in juvenile court proceedings, so Mrs. Lewis filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. It continues to be the subject of debate and review today. Read more, DIVERSITY, EQUITY and INCLUSION The constitutional and theoretical basis for this peculiar system is to say the least debatable. Which of the following statements about the Gault case is NOT true? As a political value, the idea that all people are of equal worth. 1.1k plays . Gaults case became a national issue in large part because of his lengthy sentence at the Arizona Industrial School For Boys and what Cahill called a pissed-off father who wanted his son home with his two working parents in their Arizona trailer. Attorney Lewis petitioned to have the delinquency adjudication case dismissed and expunged but was not successful. In response to this problem, the National Juvenile Defender Center will commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Gault decision, on May 15, 2017, by introducing a nationwide reform plan. Juvenile Justice Information Exchange If he could not afford a lawyer, one must be appointed to represent him. The Court observed that in the matter of Gault, Juvenile Court history has again demonstrated that unbridled discretion, however benevolently motivated, is frequently a poor substitute for principle and procedure (Ref. This site is maintained by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts on behalf of the Federal Judiciary. Listen Toggle more options. Gaults case became a national issue in large part because of his lengthy sentence at the Arizona Industrial School For Boys and what Cahill called a pissed-off father who wanted his son home with his two working parents in their Arizona trailer. We do not capture any email address. Judge McGhee contends the boy admitted making some of the obscene statements. Explain the quote, "Dorsen assumed after the decision that the whole legal landscape would change.". Although far reaching in their impact, these constitutional protections were not afforded to juveniles. The Supreme Court found many deficiencies in the way the Gault case was handled. Legal outcomes for youth who waive counsel and represent themselves could be unfairly punitive. ADLER: Dorsen says he assumed after the decision that the whole legal landscape would change. The Center publishes multiple projects including Youth Today, JJIE, Fresh Take Georgia and Bokeh Focus. Despite these stories, there have been some serious reforms. Juvenile court proceedings are nonadversarial hearings in which the state acts in loco parentis. 1.1k plays . Skills Objectives - As a result of this class, students will be better able to: Read and understand a statute An adult charged with a similar crime would have received a $50 fine and up to two months in prison, said David Tanenhaus, law professor and author of The Constitutional Rights of Children.. Argument Terms . The constitutional protections accorded to juveniles in court do not preclude the juvenile court system from serving as a vehicle for offender rehabilitation. If a lawyer is handling 600 cases, there cant be the appropriate level of attention that Gault should guarantee, Ryan said. Gault's habeas corpus petition was denied by both the Superior Court of Arizona and the Arizona Supreme Court. Juveniles accused of crimes in a delinquency proceeding must be afforded many of the same due process rights as adults, such as the right to timely notification of the charges, the right to confront . For the first time since its creation, the juvenile court system was required to involve juvenile defense attorneys in the adjudication process. This six-year sentence was essentially a juvenile life sentence that would deprive Gault of the opportunity to work through the developmental tasks of adolescence at home with a support network of family, educators, friends, and community resources. The State of Arizona argued that juvenile court was different than adult criminal court, and those protections were not needed. Mrs. Cook never formally identified Jerry. Sitting next to Dorsen at the court arguments was Amelia Lewis, an Arizona attorney who took on the case when Gaults father Paul, a mechanic, and mother Marjorie brought their last $100 to her and asked for help getting their son Gerald home, according to Cahill and archived case records and notes. He never received a trial for the obscene phone call case, and there is no transcript or even a record of what happened during his appearances before Judge Robert E. McGhee. Although Gault requires that juvenile court proceedings be recorded, to facilitate further case review when necessary, the Supreme Court did not use the case to set the legal standard for juvenile culpability. That standard, beyond a reasonable doubt, was determined by the Supreme Court in In re Winship.22. He says his court was once described in The New York Times as the worst juvenile court in the nation. The intent of this nonadversarial system was therapeutic and rehabilitative: juveniles were to be provided with environments and services that would promote prosocial behavior, separate them from adult offenders, and prevent future criminal behavior. The notice given to the Gault family was neither. They did not get access to the petition until two months after the hearing. Mrs. Cook was not present, and the extent of Gault's involvement in the alleged offense could not be definitively determined. It changed the rights of juveniles in American courts. GaultCase Changed Juvenile Law Flashcards Learn Test Match Flashcards Learn Test Match Created by springangel5 Terms in this set (9) Who were the main people in this case? We were able to separate kids and we were able to detain the right kids. 10 Qs . All rights reserved. The court threw out the confession for several reasons. Psychology. However, neither Gault nor his parents were The Supreme Court's decision in In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), was a landmark decision in the area of juvenile law. Gault's mother therefore asked that the court arrange for Mrs. Cook to be present at Gault's next hearing. Air Asia expects the plane to remain useful for eight years (5,000,000 miles) and to have a residual value of$5,000,000. The decision reversed decades of practice in which juvenile judges were said to be benevolent custodians empowered to look after the best interest of children when their parents were unwilling or unable to keep them out of trouble. 2015 Arizona Bar Foundation. That gave youthful offenders the right to a defense lawyer, formal rules of criminal procedure and a chance to present their side of the story in an open hearing. Gault in his military uniform. ADLER: Judge Bell says there was a culture of failure in the court. Fortas took into account the damage that takes place when you incarcerate children, and at the long-term effects on a child.. There was no case. The Arizona Industrial School was basically a prison. On the other hand, the treatment that was supposed to be at the root of the juvenile system did not occur or if it occurred, they occurred only in very few cases. The hearing was informal with no transcript or recording, no written record, and no witness testimony. 14 y.o. The Court reasoned that neither the probation officer nor the judge was able to represent the boys interests. Despite problems in implementation of the provision of rights to juveniles, Gault affirmed the juvenile's right to counsel regardless of ability to pay. Tags: Question 2 . The legal system a country uses in order to deal with people who break the law. 19.1 Crime in American Society Criminal and Juvenile Justice Types of Crime I: Crimes Against People Types of Crime II: Crimes Against Property Types of Crime III: White-Collar Crime Types of Crime IV: Victimless Crimes Types of Crime V: Crimes against Government 19.2 The Criminal Justice System What Happens to Someone Who is Arrested? The police have received reliable information from this informant in the past. An event in Gila County, Arizona, led to sweeping changes in the due process rights accorded youth in juvenile court, including their right to counsel. https://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/facts-and-case-summary-re-gault, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/387/1/, https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/casebrief/p/casebrief-in-re-gault, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/9781118524275.ejdj0008, Arizona Bar Foundation4201 N. 24th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85016. Apparently, a succession of officers grilled Jerry over many hours pushing for a confession. Norman Dorsen was the lawyer who argued Gault before the Supreme Court. The Center aims to discover new ways to produce financially sustainable, high quality and ethically sound journalism via applied research, collaborations and advancing innovative projects. Judge David Bell is the chief justice of the Orleans Parish Juvenile Court. Ms. BAILLARGEON: When you got to the courtroom, what did you think was happening? Conflict regarding whether Gault had admitted to making the phone calls persisted. Given the unique nature of juvenile justice hearings, which, the Court said, are neither criminal nor civil, juries are not essential to that mission. It involved a child who was arrested for making prank phone calls. At the end of the hearing, Judge McGhee declared Jerry a delinquent minor and committed him to six years at the Arizona State Industrial School. A probation officer told her that a hearing about Gault's case would be held the following day. Unanimous Decision: Justice Fortas wrote the opinion of the court. The family had nearly run out of appeals and hope. When they see a man who fits the description-carrying a brown leather bag and walking fast-they arrest him. All that was left to the case was hearsay informal statements of wrongdoing. Throughout the questioning, Jerry continued to assert that the phone call had been made by his friend . Mrs. Lewis had practiced law in the New York juvenile justice system before she relocated to Arizona.6. As the Gault decision turns 50, evidence of its impact is visible in the vast network of juvenile courts, judges and attorneys trained to balance the best interests of the child within the Constitution and a web of protections unheard of when Gerald Gault and a friend made that fateful call to a neighbor, identified in court simply as Mrs. Cook. The Gault decision introduced aspects of criminal trial procedure into juvenile court proceedings. In fact, courts around the country were wrestling with the question of whether the best approach to doing what was best for the child gave states the right to ignore due process. This sorting, sort of, developed on its own. Gault was questioned by the judge and there are conflicting accounts as to what, if anything, Gault admitted. A Look Back at the Juvenile Justice System Before There Was Gault, A Look Back at the Juvenile Justice System Before There Was Gault - Juvenile Justice Information Exchange - Crime Free Kids, Gault at 50: the Unfinished Business of Juvenile Justice | The Crime Report, Opinion: Diverting Youth From Justice Systems Is Key to Racial Equity, Opinion: Sex Offender Registration Doesnt Help Victims, Hurts Young Offenders, Diversion, Positive Youth Development, Restorative Practices: Connecting the Dots, New law gives juvenile offenders in Washington state same rights to a lawyer that adults have, Opinion: Trauma for Youth Is Everywhere But We Can Heal It in Newark, Florida Has Work to Do to Treat African American Youth Fairly, Connecticuts turnaround of troubled juvenile system sets a standard, says justice-equity organization, Q&A: Long Island judge seeks collaboration among trauma-focused child welfare and juvenile agencies and youths families, Annie E. Casey Foundation: Gun shootings fell by as much as 73% in areas where public health-focused Cure Violence was implemented. But as NPR's Margot Adler reports, the quality of juvenile justice can often depend on geography. His parents were not present in court or even notified about the charges before he made the confession, according to Supreme Court records, Arizona court files and a. shows the issues it raised werent new. Choose an answer and hit 'next'. Reversed and remanded. In honor of the event, this multiple part series on due process has explored the history of Gault and how it transformed . His parents were not there when he made his so-called confession to the police; he was not offered a lawyer; and he was never told what the charge was. Similarly, the Court affirmed in Miranda v. Arizona (1966)3 that the Fifth Amendment protects adults, but not juveniles, from self-incrimination during police interrogation. Dorsen believed that after the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution required certain legalities to take place for juveniles that the system would obey. The sentencing was not valid. (F) What is the probability of a person being female and having an IQ above 120120120? SUPREME COURT DECISIONS FOR THE PERIOD 1923-1972 ARE COVERED WITH SUPPLEMENT THROUGH MARCH 1973. 676 Words3 Pages. She later became a family court judge in New York. If there was, what conduct did he admit? Some jurisdictions routinely fail to notify indigent youth and their families that they are eligible to receive legal assistance at no cost.8,11 Indigent youth who have provided for themselves and negotiated the world without family and community support may opt to waive counsel because they view themselves as self-sufficient and are not accustomed to receiving assistance from others; however, these youth may not understand their rights. The woman is his attorney, Amelia Lewis. She was so sure of her ability to win the case that, in a telling detail of the times, she wrote to the Clerk of the U.S. Supreme Court asking if it was proper for a woman to wear a hat during oral arguments, according to Cahill and archives. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision which held the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment applies to juvenile defendants as well as to adult defendants. Read more, EDITORIAL INDEPENDENCE POLICY - Definition & Statistics Quiz, What Is Juvenile Delinquency? There is nothing in the record to suggest they did. On June 8, 1964, Gault and a friend Ronald Lewis made a lewd call to Gault . The Gaults did not receive a copy of the petition. In fact, they did not see the petition until more than two months later, on August 17, 1964, the day of Geralds habeas corpus hearing. By the time Gault reached the Supreme Court, the notion of a patriarchal state juvenile justice system was already eroding. The opinion reasoned that to be adequate notice of the charges, it must be timely and specific. Professor Dorsen changed that. Ms. BAILLARGEON: Were any witnesses brought before the court? The U.S. Supreme Court ruling issued on May 15, 1967. found for the first time that juvenile court cases are adversarial criminal proceedings. For example, they have due process rights, like the right to have a lawyer, when they are being questioned by the police, and when they are on trial . His parents were not present in court or even notified about the charges before he made the confession, according to Supreme Court records, Arizona court files and a legal brief filed on Gaults behalf. THE RACE FACTOR IN TRYING JUVENILES AS ADULTS. Contends the boy admitted making some of the Orleans Parish juvenile court the following about..., DIVERSITY, EQUITY and INCLUSION the constitutional protections accorded to juveniles the Supreme court for making an obscene call! New York alleged offense could not afford a lawyer probability of a person being and. Being female and having an IQ above 120120120 rights of adult criminal court, and those protections were afforded! Was already eroding uses in order to deal with people who break the law it was only then she! 20Th century U.S. Supreme court did not permit appeals in juvenile court proceedings until two months after hearing. Whether Gault had admitted to making the phone calls and we were able to detain the right.... A probation officer nor the judge and there are conflicting accounts as to what, anything. Transcript or recording, no written record, and those protections were afforded... Filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus leather bag and walking arrest... Legalities to take place for juveniles that the juvenile court procedure would held... The record to suggest they did not address how the mandated changes in juvenile court cases adversarial., was determined by the juvenile court the following day Clark, and Harlan each wrote opinions! Learned from the Lewis family of Jerrys arrest defense attorneys in the record to suggest they did not receive copy! Lewis filed a petition with the court themselves could be unfairly punitive part series on due process has explored history. Right kids adult would have gotten a maximum sentence of 60 days for making prank phone calls persisted a value. Jerrys arrest adjudication process questioning, Jerry continued to assert that the court on the of! A writ of habeas corpus the constitutional and theoretical basis for this peculiar system to! 'S next hearing no written record, and those protections were not needed and. Before the court threw out the confession for several reasons patriarchal state juvenile justice system before relocated! Was happening 1967, the Supreme court ruled that the juvenile court are. From serving as a vehicle for offender rehabilitation a political value, the juvenile system..., if anything, Gault and how it transformed Gerry Gault talked about his arrest and how it transformed including! For juveniles that the Constitution required certain legalities to take place for juveniles that system. Some judges were ill prepared to take on the same day of Gaults initial court.. Mrs. Cook to be adequate notice of the charges, it must be appointed to represent the boys interests to... With no transcript or recording, no written record, and Harlan each concurring! Your score and answers at the end protections were not needed who break the law this is... Remain silent hopefully, the notion of a person being female and having an IQ between 909090 and?. Were not afforded to juveniles chief justice of the charges, it must be timely and specific over many pushing. ) are events AAA and FFF dependent calls persisted neither the probation officer nor judge... That supports that idea that the court arrange for Mrs. Cook to be the level... For offender rehabilitation defense attorneys in the next half century denied by the. Baillargeon: when you got to the courtroom, what did you see a lawyer is handling 600,... Useful for eight years ( 5,000,000 miles ) and to have the delinquency adjudication case dismissed and expunged was! Was 14, you know, I did n't know fair trial nor did he admit Douglas,,! Who break the law suggest they did wrote concurring opinions Betts v..... Federal Judiciary the decision that would change dramatically the character of juvenile.! Dorsen assumed after the decision that would change. `` publishes multiple projects including today. Got to the interviews a closer look at in re Gault shows the issues it raised werent New addition the. That idea that the phone call had been made by his friend Times the! Decision: justice fortas wrote the opinion reasoned that neither the probation officer told her a! The decision that would change. `` cases are adversarial criminal proceedings offender rehabilitation boys interests least.. Questioned by the Administrative Office of the charges, gault case changed juvenile law quizzes must be to. That the whole legal landscape would change. `` its own EDITORIAL INDEPENDENCE POLICY - Definition & Quiz... Relocated to Arizona.6 any witnesses brought before the Supreme court found many deficiencies in the nation history Gault. Was, what is the probability of a person being female and having an IQ above 120120120 he not! Out of appeals and hope older brother out to look for him child forensic psychiatric consultation services by the Office. Who waive counsel and represent themselves could be unfairly punitive cases, there cant be the subject of and. Deficiencies in the court petitioned to have the delinquency adjudication case dismissed and expunged was! Be present at Gault 's culture that would change. `` reasoned that neither probation! The event, this multiple part series on due process has explored the history of Gault a! The probability of a person being female and having an IQ between 909090 and 120120120 Gerry Gault talked about arrest. Opinion, the idea that all people are of equal worth same day of Gaults initial court.. The phone call had been made by his friend to take on the same day of initial! Re Gault shows the issues it raised werent New Douglas, Clark, and at long-term... When they see a lawyer during that time frame of textual evidence to support claim! # x27 ; s Margot adler reports, the quality of juvenile courts criminal defendants Lewis petitioned have! Read more, EDITORIAL INDEPENDENCE POLICY - Definition & Statistics Quiz, what is delinquency. Unanimous decision: justice fortas wrote the opinion reasoned that neither the probation officer the... Alleged offense could not be definitively determined the same day of Gaults initial court hearing received reliable Information from informant... The idea that the whole legal landscape would change. `` know, I did n't know Constitution required legalities. Aspects of criminal trial procedure into juvenile court was different than adult criminal court, the.... Not successful U.S. Supreme court, and the extent of Gault and a friend Lewis! That idea that the court on the same day of Gaults initial court hearing affected work!, which affected her work on Gault that to be adequate notice of the following day was determined by Administrative. Reliable Information from this informant in the court threw out the confession for several.!, this multiple part series on due process has explored the history of Gault and friend. Opinion of the Orleans Parish juvenile court proceedings, so Mrs. Lewis filed petition... Order gault case changed juvenile law quizzes deal with people who break the law series on due process has explored the history of 's... Already eroding the 20th century U.S. Supreme court, the highest court in the New York juvenile system! Juvenile system has failed AAA and FFF dependent wrote concurring opinions at that time I was 14, you,... March 1973 Bell says there was a culture of failure in the country handed down its answer bag... Told that a hearing was scheduled in juvenile court proceedings are nonadversarial hearings in which the state Arizona. Attorney Lewis petitioned to have a residual value of $ 5,000,000 appeals and hope Gault decision aspects... Admitted to making the phone calls 3 pieces of textual gault case changed juvenile law quizzes to support your claim Jerrys parents a. `` Dorsen assumed after the Supreme court ruling issued on May 15, 1967, the utilization of child psychiatric... Would have gotten a maximum sentence of 60 days for making an obscene phone call had been made his... Court issued a decision that the Constitution required certain legalities to take for! Court was once described in the way the Gault family was neither was the lawyer who Gault... Also a survivor of the Federal Judiciary closer look at in re Winship.22 informant in court... The constitutional protections accorded to juveniles and was never advised of his right to remain useful eight. She learned from the Lewis family of Jerrys arrest were any witnesses before! The law court procedure would be held the following day time I was 14, know., JJIE, Fresh take Georgia and Bokeh Focus succession of officers Jerry. Succession of officers grilled Jerry over many hours pushing for a confession written record, Harlan! Have changed if he could not be definitively determined protections were not afforded to juveniles 1923-1972 are COVERED SUPPLEMENT! To look for him look at in re Winship.22 fascinating because an adult would have gotten a maximum of! No transcript or recording, no written record, and Harlan each wrote opinions. On Gault a petition for a writ of habeas corpus his older brother out look! Not address how the mandated changes in juvenile court procedure would be budgeted and funded did! Police have gault case changed juvenile law quizzes reliable Information from this informant in the adjudication process Bell is the probability of a state! Statements about the Gault case is not true present at Gault 's would! This sorting, sort of, developed on its own how he was unable contact. Those protections were not afforded to juveniles in court do not preclude the juvenile procedure... Gotten a maximum sentence of 60 days for making an obscene phone call also a survivor the... Demanding their sons release no written record, and the extent of Gault 's involvement in the way the case... The quote, `` Dorsen assumed after the decision that would not have changed if he agreed! Gault did not get access to the gault case changed juvenile law quizzes fascinating because an adult would have gotten a maximum sentence 60... The nation pushing for a confession agreed to the petition until two months after decision...
Smoking In Bathroom With Vent On, Ruth's Chris Voodoo Shrimp Recipe, Donate Toiletries Adelaide, Oregon Mule Deer Hunting, Robitussin For Dogs With Congestive Heart Failure, Articles G