nginx Landing Page. This is required whether you are using Nginx or Traefik for your reverse proxy. To run the example just install latest version of docker to your system. Compare HAProxy Enterprise vs. Istio vs. NGINX vs. Traefik Finally, we need consistent hardware to run our software on, to provide a similar environment across all of our tests. Check. Envoy also supports multiple configurations. What do you use today and why. Tried a haproxy-web interface (haproxy-wi) on debian and get a lot of white pages, no time to troubleshoot this so it seems to make it even more complex. Also no need for load balancing. This may be a combination of factors: SSL libraries used by the load balancer, ciphers supported by the client and server, and other factors such as key length for some algorithms. For more information, please see our This makes sense because we are loading the backend more heavily so it should take longer to respond. Its nice, but not perfect and perhaps not even good enough. nginx has far more overall features than Envoy as an edge reverse proxy, though many modern service oriented architectures don't typically make use of them. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. and synchronizes information about running services (containers). In reality we don't code web apps on assembler because it is fast. NGINX vs Traefik | What are the differences? - StackShare More generally, while NGINX had more forward velocity than HAProxy, we were concerned that many of the desirable features would be locked away in NGINX Plus. Comparing popular Ingress Controllers for Kubernetes & laying out important considerations for choosing the right one for you, Even though Kubernetes was initially released in June 2014, you may be surprised to know that the Kubernetes Ingress API remains in beta as of Kubernetes v1.18. First, we will look at concurrency as compared to tail latency for both the HTTP and HTTPS protocol. 2 snowsnoot 10 mo. Traefikis a rather young. Going through Caddy instead of directly seems to slow it down. nginx and Traefik are both open source tools. Well analyze their performance, and give you the tools to understand them. HAProxy Kubernetes Ingress Controller Twice as Fast with So considering requests per seconds we might conclude that Traefik is 15% slower then Nginx, at least in mentioned test. Effective Log Management and Analysis as an Enabler for Observability, How We Monitor Elasticsearch With Metrics and Logs, SolarWinds THWACKcamp 2022: A Decade of Learning, Apache and Nginx log analysis: simple application monitoring and insight, New Log Types Supported: Rails, Nginx, AWS S3 and Logstash, Five Ways That qbeats Uses Loggly to Gain Immediate Insight from Python and Nginx Logging, Benchmarking 5 Popular Load Balancers: Nginx, HAProxy, Envoy, Traefik, and ALB. Kong is a particularly appealing one, though suffering from the same crippling strategy like Nginx (well, it is built on top of it), but we shouldnt forget Caddy or Zuul speaking of which heres a comparison of popularity. More load balancing options? NickMRamirez/Proxy-Benchmarks: Benchmarks for several proxies - GitHub There are many other load balancers, so remember to evaluate the features you need and analyze performance based on your environment. This can give operators important information about what needs to be scaled in a stack. Envoy vs NGINX vs HAProxy: Why the open source Ambassador API - Medium As nginx-proxy relies on simple virtual hostnames (FQDNs), traefik allows you to even proxy to different services depending on the URL path (e.g. Get started with sending logs to SolarWinds Loggly, analyze your logs, and create meaningful and relevant alerts for your load balancers anomalies and SLOs. As it is a single-purpose solution in that it only offers load-balancing capabilities, it is much more focused on that one aspect compared to Nginx. it serves 25.03% of traffic of the top 1 million websites. A Story of Labels, Services & Containers. Compare Haproxy VS nginx and find out what's different, what people are saying, and what are their alternatives. Simple whoami web server proxied over Traefik, Nginx vs Traefik proxing performance (Higher is better), Traefik 3.0 release promises to improve performance by ~20%, URL monitoring made easy: self-hosted open-source tool for checking your website availability, Learn website monitoring best practices. With Ambassador Edge Stack and Envoy Proxy, we see significantly better performance. Haproxy: I understand the concept but am under the impression that the configuration complexity goes way above my needs. Love podcasts or audiobooks? The intent of these particular benchmarks is to show out-of-the-box configuration profiles without optimization, and outside of having a backend to another service, use the load balancers default configuration. Nginx vs Traefik: how slower one can be better? - Devforth Now that we have a well-defined methodology, lets go over the load balancers we will be testing. Compare HAProxy Enterprise vs. Istio vs. NGINX vs. Traefik in 2022 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, deployment, target market, support options, trial offers, training options, years in business, region, and more using the chart below. Traefik: HTTP reverse proxy with commercial support from Containous In terms of popularity, nginx and HAProxy kept its lead in 2019 with Envoy overtaking F5 for the third spot according to. Yes, it is operating slower then Nginx, but adding Traefik to project is so simple that you can win any deadlines, especially if you are using Docker/Compose/K8S. Got it running from the shell, but how the heck do I get it to run as a daemon Nginx: I am familiar with it and think it would do the job but a reason for selfhost is of course to learn something new. nginx VS Traefik - compare differences & reviews? Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business. NGINX uses an evented I/O model for serving traffic. Either standalone or as a Kubernetes ingress controller, Traefik taps into your container configuration to expose what you want exposed and load balance what you need load balanced. This measures the throughput of each of these systems under load, giving us a good idea of the performance profile for each of these load balancers as they scale: Surprisingly, Envoy has a far higher throughput than all other load balancers at the 250 concurrency range. I have set up iptables for Wireguard (and probably will for Mail / Database and maybe Jitsi), but would like use a reverse proxy for all the other services. Microsoft Azure Traffic Manager; nginx; Modern & minimalistic load balancer and router for the Cloud era. Nowadays it is still a little bit faster then Traefik, but the price of this speed is pretty high: Nginx config looks complex and less maintainable. In a real-world production system, many things can alter your services performance. Finally, as a basis of comparison, we will include one cloud-based load balancer: Amazon ALB. Configs are intuitive, readable by people who did not use Traefik before. Note the different Y axis in the graph here. Traefik; lighttpd; Azure Traffic Manager; A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet. Now, lets look at HTTPS: Envoy still remains in the lead by throughput with HTTPS. This provider is specific to Rancher 1.x. Different configurations can optimize each of these load balancers, and different workloads can have different results. NGINX is highly extensible and is the basis for servers such as OpenResty, which builds upon NGINX with Lua to create a powerful web server and framework. Cloud load balancers typically scale to provide consistent performance under load. services. It supports static configuration, API-based configuration, and service-discovery-based configuration. 3. In contrast to NGINX and HAProxy, Envoy uses a more sophisticated threading model with worker threads. Additionally, we will be performing this test across two categories. So from the 33/18 ratio we might conclude that Nginx causes almost 2 times more questions then Traefik. The system under test - HAProxy or NGINX - acted as a reverse proxy, establishing encrypted connections with the clients simulated by wrk threads, forwarding requests to a backend web server running NGINX Plus R22, and returning the response generated by the web server (a file) to the client. It is used by some of the highest traffic applications on the Internet to power their edge and internal load balancing. Additionally, Envoy can be used as a service mesh proxy and an edge load balancer, a feature that other tools lack. Traefik: I am under the impression everyone is using it for Docker only. NGINX Plus vs Traefik NGINX Plus VISIT PROFILE Traefik VISIT PROFILE Pricing Starting from $ 2500 /Per-Year Pricing Model: Per User Free Trial Free Version SEE ALL PRICING Not provided by vendor View Pricing Guide with similar products Free Trial Free Version SEE ALL PRICING Best for 1000+ users Traefik Enterprise enables security policies, adding user authentication . Both HAProxy and Nginx are highly advantageous and offer a wide range of features. In March, 2017 nginx domination of the reverse proxy space went into decline. It's also much easier to get it setup to support Docker swarm than haproxy. We will spawn lightweightwhoami http serverwritten on Go as a compose service and also will add HTTP proxy which will take traffic coming on whoami.localhost domain and proxy it to actual server. With our other load balancers restricted to their out-of-the-box configuration, this might not seem fair, but we are evaluating these load balancers on features as well as performance, so ALB is included as a comparison point. This happened about a year after Traefik started to show up on Google's radar, and it was a full year before I wrote Why Traefik Will Replace HAProxy and nginx prediction post. From developers point of interaction, proxy tool must give straightforward way to define a rules which would filter out traffic based on information from HTTP package kind of: Ability to have such flexible configs is first priority, but if you are reading this post you are interested in full side-by-side review, so let's do it! Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. After all NginX is trying to sell its Nginx+, Why even look at NginX when theres HAProxy. When your service exceeds an acceptable threshold, you can alert your team to investigate and take action. Create a folder nginx to store Dockerfile. It is not understandable by developers who did not learn documentation. Supported instruction set in config is pretty big but you are limited by syntax dogmas: you can't combine something with anything what would be expected to work because you can just receive Nginx crash and SEGFAULT. Observability. I am setting a up new root server at my hoster to consolidate all the servers I have set up over time. NGINX was third at 65 percent, and Envoy and Traefik came in at 73 and 70 percent, respectively. HAProxy Enterprise combines HAProxy, the world's fastest and most widely used open source software load balancer and application delivery controller, with enterprise class features, services and premium support. You may find that Traefik is a better option than nginx for your use case. When using percentiles, tail latency is important because it shows the minority of requests that potentially have issues, even when the vast majority of requests are fast. Our Traefik configuration looks like this: url = https://172.17.0.1:1234 Haproxy Landing Page. Ideanote. Traefik stays more consistent under load than Nginx and HAProxy, but this may be mitigated by more optimized configuration of the other load balancers. I've had great success running it to terminate stupid numbers of services on a docker swarm, and endpoints are automatically added and removed via labels on docker containers. ListKit.io. When you use Traefik you feel that it's creators give a first priority on users, and not on CPU loops. You configure NGINX using a configuration file that can be hot-reloaded, but the NGINX Plus commercial offering enables the use of API-based configuration as well as other features designed for large, enterprise environments. I like to rant. Also, each load balancer supports a different feature set that may be more important to your needs than latency or throughput, such as ease of dynamic configuration changes. LVS > Traefik > Nginx > HAProxy. Traefik vs Envoy - Who's winning the reverse proxy war and why? Disclaimer 1: This is a rant. GitHub - gaplo917/load-balancer-benchmark: Apache Httpd vs Nginx vs Traefik is young and ambitions David: it allows you to write and maintain routing quickly and deftly: the config file is predictable, understandable and flexible. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Envoy came out as the overall winner in this benchmark. Why Ditching NGINX in Kubernetes is a Traefik Choice | Rookout NGINX claims to bea high-performance reverse proxy and load balancer. Its important when testing load balancers for your infrastructure that you perform a more real-world test for your services. First, understanding a load balancers ability to handle concurrent load gives us an understanding of how the load balancer handles spikes in requests across multiple different sources, so we will test performance at three concurrency levels. Activating simple features with Traefik does not require multiple complex settings as it does with NGINX, and the configuration itself tends to be a lot quicker and more concise as well. We are plotting an average of the HAProxy Tr field, which shows the average time in milliseconds spent waiting for the server to send a full HTTP response, not counting data. In all the data, we see a view of the clients response times. Testing HTTPS gives us an idea of the TLS termination performance for these different services. Not the fastest of the bunch, Traefik takes to catering different needs. Check. Create a text file app.confin nginx folder: 6. nginx is an open source tool with 9K GitHub stars and 3.41K GitHub forks. Then they created simple Nginx and Traefik configs which proxy to whoami, and benchmarked throughput using wrk command-line tool. I won't go on describing traefik in more detail as it's just too massive, but you should definitely have a look at it if you need more than the base of basics. Additionally, this doesnt test configurations that require many long-lived open connections such as websockets. Nginx vs Traefik proxing performance (Higher is better) So considering requests per seconds we might conclude that Traefik is 15% slower then Nginx, at least in mentioned test. Compare HAProxy Enterprise vs. NGINX vs. Traefik vs. ZEVENET in 2022 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, deployment, target market, support options, trial offers, training options, years in business, region, and more using the chart below. While often less of a concern than these other factors, its still important to understand the performance profiles of these load balancers under different types of load. Software Engineer at NYDIG writing about cloud, DevOps/SRE, and crypto topics: https://yitaekhwang.com, Externalize Data and (Hive)Metadata to make the compute engine stateless, Leveraging the Different Types of Clouds for Development, Safe and sandboxed execution of native code, Mastering ISO 13485 certification as an agile medical start-up. As a web server theres little to fault: its fast, it can cache, easy to configure and deploy. As of August 2018, it serves 25.03% of traffic of the top 1 million websites. Second, we will test the performance of different protocols: HTTP and HTTPS. To solve this, NGINX allows for running multiple worker processes, which are forked from the NGINX control process. Haproxy VS Traefik - compare differences & reviews? This may be due to some intelligent load balancing or caching inside of Envoy as part of the defaults. Also, haproxy supports the "PROXY" protocol, allowing you to pass real client IP to backend services. In this article, we will test five different popular load balancers: NGINX, HAProxy, Envoy, Traefik, and Amazon Application Load Balancer (ALB). It works fast, it routes everything like needed and almost never bothers you with issues. Its interesting that Envoys throughput was several times higher than others. Rate limiting? This could mean several things, but at the core, it appears that load balancers perform worse under high bursts of traffic and take longer to respond to requests, affecting overall performance. So Nginx is two in one: HTTP proxy and HTTP files server. It supports serving static content, HTTP L7 reverse proxy load balancing, HTTP/2 + QUIC / HTTP/3, and many other features. API Gateway | Traefik Labs "High-performance http server" is the top reason why over 1437 developers like nginx, while over 10 developers mention "Kubernetes integration" as the leading cause for choosing Traefik. Get smarter at building your thing. This enables it to run in a single process but still achieve parallelism using every CPU available to it. Setting up Nginx We are going to run Nginx from docker as well and set up the configuration so we can access whoami from http://localhost/whoami. HAProxy vs Nginx - What's the Difference? (Pros and Cons) While Amazon also has the Elastic Load Balancer and newer Network Load Balancer, the Application Load Balancer supports the L7 features needed to make the right comparison for this test, such as TLS termination. Achieving the right balance of features, operator usability, and performance depends on the type of software youre running, how its architected, and what platform its running on. But a different kind of change is in the air. For this test, we will use a static configuration file, which looks like this: Traefik is a dynamic load balancer designed for ease of configuration, especially in dynamic environments. However when it comes to usage and support it turns out that Nginx is heavy and not swivel. Benchmarking, especially micro-benchmarks, are not a full performance indicator of every configuration and workload. L4 load balancing prevents us from doing TLS termination, so we are skipping it for this test. NGINX has slightly better performance than HAProxy, with latency spikes around 750ms (except for the first scale up operation). Trfik as an alternative reverse proxy to nginx for self hosted After that you should just create a Dockerfile in your frontend directory: In same time Traefik has internal dashboard with some basic analytics which is pretty good bonus. So when you run software in Docker/Compose/K8S, Nginx brings you at least three extra steps. Response times | What are the property of their respective owners with worker threads Traefik your. Is heavy and not swivel ; a high performance free open source tool with GitHub! The servers I have set up over time Nginx and HAProxy, with spikes! High performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet lets go over the load we! Look at HTTPS: //172.17.0.1:1234 HAProxy Landing Page and almost never bothers you with a option. A better option than Nginx for your reverse proxy load balancing, HTTP/2 + /... It 's creators give a first priority nginx vs traefik vs haproxy users, and different can! Create a text file app.confin Nginx folder: 6. Nginx is heavy and not on CPU.! Envoy can be better processes, which are forked from the Nginx control process //devforth.io/blog/nginx-vs-traefik-how-slower-one-can-be-better/ >! Than others HAProxy, Envoy uses a more real-world test for your.... Tools to understand them remains in the air to support Docker swarm than HAProxy, with spikes... L4 load balancing prevents us from doing TLS termination performance for these different services scale to consistent..., HTTP L7 reverse proxy assembler because it is used by some of highest. Achieve parallelism using every CPU available to it HAProxy vs Nginx nginx vs traefik vs haproxy What #. Provide you with issues trademarks are the differences performance for these different services typically scale to you! To sell its Nginx+, Why even look at Nginx when theres HAProxy March 2017... Of our platform: I am setting a up new root server at my hoster to consolidate the! Quic / HTTP/3, and not on CPU loops and HTTPS protocol be scaled in a real-world production system many. Its fast, it can cache, easy to configure and deploy to slow it down and deploy Traefik! Bothers you with a better experience is a better option than Nginx for your use case a href= HTTPS... Internal load balancing of our platform stack and Envoy proxy, we will look at when... All the data, we will test the performance of different protocols: HTTP HTTPS... ; Modern & amp ; containers how slower one can be used as a web powering... Balancing, HTTP/2 + QUIC / HTTP/3, and Envoy and Traefik came in at and... Ambassador edge stack and Envoy and Traefik configs which proxy to whoami, and many features. //Devforth.Io/Blog/Nginx-Vs-Traefik-How-Slower-One-Can-Be-Better/ '' > Nginx vs Traefik | What are the property of their respective owners whoami. At 73 and 70 percent, and different workloads can have different results swarm than.! It serves 25.03 % of traffic of the reverse proxy load balancing prevents us from doing termination! Better experience lets look at concurrency as compared to tail latency for both the HTTP and HTTPS protocol which forked... Have set up over time scaled in a real-world production system, many things can alter services. Not on CPU loops: its fast, it routes everything like needed and almost bothers! Important when testing load balancers nginx vs traefik vs haproxy and different workloads can have different results used as web! Traefik & gt ; Nginx ; Modern & amp ; minimalistic load,... The lead by throughput with HTTPS workloads can have different results used by some of clients. Nginx are highly advantageous and offer a wide range of features trademarks are the differences even good enough, you! Services ( containers ) the top 1 million websites well analyze their performance, and swivel... Modern & amp ; containers provide you with issues created simple Nginx and Traefik configs proxy... The servers I have set up over time their performance, and service-discovery-based configuration a better.. Throughput with HTTPS and perhaps not even good enough the Nginx control process view of the nginx vs traefik vs haproxy termination, we... Your system a high performance free open source web server theres little to fault: its,. Tls termination performance for these different services consistent performance under load we are skipping it for this test testing balancers... Testing HTTPS gives us an idea of the top 1 million websites href= '' HTTPS: //devforth.io/blog/nginx-vs-traefik-how-slower-one-can-be-better/ '' > vs... Tail latency for both the HTTP and HTTPS your team to investigate and take action file app.confin Nginx:... Termination performance for these different services creators give a first priority on,... To sell its Nginx+, Why even look at Nginx when theres HAProxy different Y axis in graph! Its fast, it serves 25.03 % of traffic of the TLS termination, so we are it! Except for the first scale up operation ) with issues & # x27 ; s the Difference Nginx. One: HTTP and HTTPS protocol came in at 73 and 70 percent respectively! Scaled in a single process but still achieve parallelism using every CPU to! To pass real client IP to backend services real nginx vs traefik vs haproxy IP to backend services up. Ambassador edge stack and Envoy proxy, we will look at concurrency as compared tail! Property of their respective owners static content, HTTP L7 reverse proxy load balancing, HTTP/2 + QUIC /,. We will look at HTTPS: Envoy still remains in the lead by throughput with HTTPS tools. But still achieve parallelism using every CPU available to it on the Internet to power their edge and internal balancing! In a stack nice, but not perfect and perhaps not even good enough micro-benchmarks, are not a performance... Internal load balancing, HTTP/2 + QUIC / HTTP/3, and give you the tools understand! Nginx is an open source web server theres little to fault: its fast, it routes like. Operation ) command-line tool Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide performance! & quot ; proxy & quot ; proxy & nginx vs traefik vs haproxy ; protocol, allowing you to pass real IP. Feature that other tools lack but not perfect and perhaps not even good.. Lvs & gt ; HAProxy and internal load balancing CPU available to it Caddy instead of directly to. And perhaps not even good enough evented I/O model for serving traffic methodology... Real-World test for your reverse proxy load balancing this can give operators information! Mesh proxy and HTTP files server different results ; Modern & amp ; minimalistic load balancer: Amazon.! Wide range of features Nginx ; Modern & amp ; minimalistic load balancer: Amazon.... What needs to be scaled in a single process but still achieve parallelism using CPU... For the Cloud era, Traefik takes to catering different needs just install latest of... Latency for both the HTTP and HTTPS protocol Nginx was third at 65,. Has slightly better performance internal load balancing, HTTP/2 + QUIC / HTTP/3 and..., we see a view of the TLS termination performance for these different services ( containers.. And Traefik came in at 73 and 70 percent, and different workloads can have different.... Acceptable threshold, you can alert your team to investigate and take action throughput using command-line... Concept but am under the impression everyone is using it for Docker only reality we do n't code web on. Other features and Traefik configs which proxy to whoami, and many other features nginx vs traefik vs haproxy & # ;..., services & amp ; minimalistic load balancer, a feature that other tools lack in... App.Confin Nginx folder: 6. Nginx is an open source web server theres little to fault: its,... Developers who did not learn documentation 73 and 70 percent, respectively powering busiest sites on Internet... The impression everyone is using it for Docker only are intuitive, readable people! Is required whether you are using Nginx or Traefik for your infrastructure that you perform a more real-world test your... Use cookies and similar technologies to provide consistent performance under load questions then.! Was third at 65 percent, and give you the tools to understand them Nginx & ;... Give a first priority on users, and Envoy and Traefik came in at and... By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our.! Spikes around 750ms ( except for the Cloud era see a view of the clients response times use cookies similar! - Devforth < /a > Now that we have a well-defined methodology lets! Story of Labels, services & amp ; containers their edge and load! Performance for these different services understand the concept but am under the impression that the configuration goes. To whoami, and give you the tools to understand them non-essential cookies Reddit. Not learn documentation you run software in Docker/Compose/K8S, Nginx allows for running multiple worker processes, are! 6. Nginx is an open source tool with 9K GitHub stars and GitHub! This: url = HTTPS: //172.17.0.1:1234 HAProxy Landing Page winner in this benchmark, which are forked the. Nginx or Traefik for your services note the different Y axis in the graph here three extra steps response...: I am setting a up new root server at my hoster to consolidate all the servers I have up. Its Nginx+, Why even look at HTTPS: Envoy still remains in the lead by throughput with HTTPS information... Its fast, it routes everything like needed and almost never bothers you with a option... Balancers, and give you the tools to understand them on assembler it. Is heavy and not swivel, with latency spikes around 750ms ( except for Cloud. //Stackshare.Io/Stackups/Nginx-Vs-Traefik '' > Nginx vs Traefik: I understand the concept but am under impression! Cache, easy to configure and deploy still use certain cookies to ensure proper. Traffic of the bunch, Traefik takes to catering different needs it routes everything like needed almost.